Talk:Glossary
From GDWiki
I guess adding articles to the more complex terms would be a good idea? Probably neat to add internal links to terms whenever relevant articles exist.
Yes, I think that when we build up enough content for a given glossary definition, we should create a separate page for the definition and link to it from the glossary page.
Ryan Clark 13:48, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)
Blech, no way. Being forced to click a link for 3 lines of text is very annoying. I think a simple explaination, like what we have for most things here, is good to have on this page but then also have a link for those who need to know more about the subject. I see that there are some links like that here, but no where near enough. I know we don't have content about all of these terms, but I'm sure Wikipedia does. I think we should link to Wikipedia whenever we don't have out own in-depth description for each term. --Dial-Up 00:19, 21 Aug 2005 (EDT)
